Law Dissertation and Law Essay Marking Service
Our essay and dissertation marking service isn't just about being given a final grade – it's the perfect opportunity to find out the best way to build upon your work, whilst also ensuring it has been thoroughly proofread in preparation for submission. The service includes:
A final grade – The most important aspect of our service an estimated final grade for your work, based on the marking guidelines you provided. We know it can be difficult to grade your own work, so we're here to give you confidence that when you do eventually submit it, you'll know you've produced the best piece of work that you could.
Proofreading – Your marker performs a thorough check of your spelling, grammar, sense of flow and signposting. Having great content is just half of the battle when writing an essay or dissertation – the rest is in presenting that content in a concise and suitable format.
Feedback – Every single order comes with a feedback form that contains advice from your marker to detail what is required to push your essay up to the next grade, so if you're currently working at 2:1 level, we'll provide you all the information you need to get the first class grade you deserve.
Plagiarism scan – We check that you haven't unintentionally plagiarised whilst writing your essay and ensure that your referencing is correct. As part of this, we provide you with a plagiarism detection scan at no additional cost, so you can see for yourself that your work is plagiarism-free.
It's a great service with a great price tag, too – a 1,000 word essay costs as little as £24 to mark! This includes all of the features above – you'll receive your edited work, a free plagiarism report and a feedback form providing detailed feedback with your order, as well as your final grade.
So, if you're looking to boost your grade (or even just for a little extra confidence before you submit your work) then place your order today! Our standard delivery time for orders below 5,000 words is 2 days, so even if your deadline is near, we are here to help.
Alternative services
If you've got a little extra time before your deadline, or you've not even started writing your work, then you may want to consider our essay and dissertation writing services. These services come with three great guarantees:
The service also comes with a comprehensive quality check and plagiarism report, so you get can get all the help you need. Our work is always up to standard and plagiarism-free!
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation Service
It's not a common requirement for a Law degree, but you may just be asked to complete a PowerPoint presentation as an individual or group assignment. We know it's not something you're used to doing, and that's why LawTeacher.net is here to help!
Here at LawTeacher.net, our focus is the quality of the work we deliver. When you order a PowerPoint presentation, you're protected by the same guarantees and service features as our essay or dissertation writing services' customers.
We don't just make guarantees, we follow them through – that's why if we ever fail to uphold any of our guarantees, you'll receive a full refund plus your work for free. Also, if you detect plagiarism in any part of your work, then you can claim our £5,000 plagiarism bond. We're that confident that all of the work we send out is 100% original and custom written!
How we ensure we get it right
Our guarantees are arguably only the second most important aspect of our service here at LawTeacher.net. Every single order we deliver comes with:
A comprehensive quality report – We report on every single aspect of the work we're delivering, so you know that your work meets the standard you ordered. Every little detail is taken care of, from the style and presentation right down to the referencing and the relevancy of the cases and journals used.
A detailed plagiarism scan – We're proud to own our own plagiarism scanner and put it to good use preventing plagiarism in the work we deliver. Not only do we check against online sources in the same way as TurnItIn or WriteCheck do, we also check against our private database of previously completed work – a feature which no other plagiarism detection service can provide. You can leave LawTeacher.net 100% confident your work is custom written and original!
We know that guarantees of quality and originality just aren't enough. That's why we are proud to be the only custom writing and research service provider that goes the extra mile and provides you with all the proof you need to see that you're getting exactly what you've paid for.
Commitment to quality
We've been driving forward the quality of our product since we launched in 2003 and are proud of the work we complete. When you order from LawTeacher.net, you're ordering from a team of experienced academics who have been in your exact position and treat your work as though it was their own.
Not only do we provide plagiarism free and high quality work, we also recruit the best writers and pay them the best rates to ensure that when you come to us, you get exactly what you expect first time, and every time! It's our passion and commitment to the quality of our service that makes us stand out from the crowd. If you have the time, feel free to read more about what we're doing to continue to make things even better.
Practical Legal Research Service
When placing a practical legal research order, you simply provide us with the scenario that you have been provided as part of your course. A qualified professional will then take the scenario as the requirements for the piece and start the research and writing process.
This is most frequently written in the form of a memorandum to a senior solicitor who has requested your assistance in your provided scenario’s firm. Our practical legal research service provides comprehensive research of an area of law and reports on what the technical legal rules and principles are, as well as what the prospects are for client in the scenario.
We excel in providing practical legal research that is concise, to the point and detailed, using primary sources and professional practitioners’ texts rather than just relying on the academic textbooks frequently used in Undergraduate or Masters level work.
Here at LawTeacher.net, we can also provide you with a research trail as an additional element of your order. The research trail details the research strategy that was employed and includes:
LPC Drafting Writing Service
Law Teacher provides a high quality and professional LPC Draft writing service that is produced by UK academic law experts.
Legal drafting or creating legal documents is the centre around which almost everything in the legal world pivots. Drafting legal letters entails a lot more than simply putting pen to paper and getting the job done.
Care should be taken to ensure that the Solicitors' Code of Conduct regarding the proper care of client is met.
The document should serve its purpose adequately; i.e. provide guidance, information or make requests as the case may be.
If the audience is a client rather than a legal professional, then the language and the tone of the document should not contain complex legal words that are beyond the scope of the clients' understanding.
Legal documents need to be lucid and brief, whether it is meant for a busy legal colleague or a scared, confused or angry client.
It is important to maintain a balanced tone. Issues like family disputes require sensitivity, whereas those dealing with meeting deadlines need a firm tone that conveys a sense of urgency.
Accuracy of the legal content is of vital importance to maintain credibility as a legal professional. It is also crucial to stay up to date with the constant changes in civil, common, criminal and statutory law. This is of vital consequence because it would not only affect the reputation of the legal firm bringing it under scrutiny for breach of Solicitors' Code of Conduct but also cause damage to the case.
Client care is an issue of supreme importance when drafting legal documents. The Solicitors' Code of Conduct has a number of statutory requirements that should be adhered to while drafting. A large part of what should go into the letter is dictated by the first rule of the Code.
Do you need help with Drafting a legal document?
Our law experts have been Drafting LPC legal documents since 2003 and are perfectly equipped to help you.
They can research and write for you an LPC Draft on any subject that you require.
Your LPC Drafting order will be:
Written on the subject that you specify
Written by genuine UK lawyers and law graduates that have qualified on the LPC.
At the grade and level you order
Delivered on time to your online control panel or your MONEY BACK!
Law Teacher offers a genuinely high quality service
How do we achieve this?
By hiring only skilled, talented writers to complete the writing of your LPC Draft.
By ensuring that the writer we choose from our talented pool of in-house writers is certified in your chosen field of study or has current experience working in the field.
Through a careful selection process, pairing you up with a writer that not only understands it, but that'll nail delivery in a unique and original voice.
Skeleton Argument Service
An essential part of gaining your LPC qualification is being able to produce a high quality skeleton argument. A skeleton argument is the basic assertion of the case or submission that you will be putting forward. It is directed towards the judge and a copy is given to the judge and each party before the hearing.
This is then expanded upon by your oral submissions in front of the mock judge, who is often also the assessor. Therefore, we can also accompany skeleton arguments with guidance notes for your oral submission; simply let us know what you require when placing your order.
Negotiation Preparation Service
One of the key skills as a lawyer is negotiation. Very often, you will be faced with a situation where resolving the issue amicably between the parties is best for all involved. You need to get the best possible outcome for your client whilst at the same time finding a solution that the other party will accept. This is a fine balancing act and our negotiation preparation service is well placed to help you to learn the important skills involved in a good negotiation.
The key points to a good negotiation are understanding the relative strengths and weaknesses of your case and what your client and the other party wants to achieve.
Our negotiation preparation service provides you with a comprehensive assessment of the case you are working on. Once you know how likely it is that you would win at trial, you know the strength you will have in negotiations. You also need to know what the likely remedy or award would be at trial if successful in order to negotiate for a realistic outcome. Our negotiation preparation service can help you to understand the likely legal outcome so that you can be a successful negotiator.
In any negotiation, there will be certain outcomes that your client must achieve and others that they will not concede. It is important to be aware of these when entering into a negotiation and that is where our negotiation service is of great value to you. Our negotiation preparation service will guide you to ask the right questions of your client in order to be fully prepared to represent your client's best interests.
Inquisitorial system may be better for family and civil cases, says top judge
Calls for rethink on delivery of justice in era of cuts and a review on whether so many criminal cases need to go to crown court
Lord Thomas, the lord chief justice, says reductions in legal aid have already resulted in a rise in the number of unrepresented litigants in family and civil cases. Photograph: Lewis Whyld/PA
A judge-led, inquisitorial system of justice may be a better way of conducting family and civil cases where litigants are unrepresented, the lord chief justice has suggested.
In a challenge to centuries of British legal tradition based on adversarial hearings, Lord Thomas has called for a radical rethink of the way justice is delivered in an era of austerity.
The most senior judge in England and Wales also proposed reviewing whether so many criminal cases need to be sent to the crown court, a change that would significantly restrict the right to trial by jury.
While declining to endorse any particular reform, Thomas's demand for a fundamental reassessment is a wide-ranging response to the turbulence within the legal profession caused by the scale of government cutbacks being imposed on the justice system.
This Friday many criminal justice lawyers will refuse to attend court across England and Wales in protest against cuts to legal aid cuts. A rally will gather outside parliament and march to the Ministry of Justice bearing a copy of the Magna Carta scroll, symbolising the threat to 800 years of British justice.
In a separate development, the senior judiciary has published a scathing attack on plans by the justice secretary, Chris Grayling, to introduce "enhanced court fees" – charges greater than the costs of proceedings – that would raise £190m a year and enable the civil and commercial courts to cross-subsidise the loss-making family courts.
Describing the plans as "unworkable", the senior judiciary's response to a MoJ consultation said: "The judiciary has for many years consistently made clear that it does not support the policy of successive governments that the justice system should be self financing.
"None of the documents issued by the government sets out the policy justification for requiring civil court users who pay fees, some of whom will themselves be hard-pressed, to fund those unable to pay the fees. A benefit given in and for the public interest might be expected to be a public expense.
"There is no good reason for treating the civil and family courts as a single system. Their functions are quite separate. There is no obvious connection between civil claims, such as actions for damages for personal injuries, consumer disputes, claims against the government or commercial disputes between businesses, and the business of the family courts, whether care proceedings or divorce.
"The assertion in the [MoJ's] impact assessment that user demand will not change in response to planned fee rises appears to contradict a basic law of economics concerning the elasticity of demand. As this proposal stands, it is unworkable. Great care and precision would be needed if such a proposal is to be taken forward to avoid not only injustice but also damage to the international position of London and hence the UK economy."
Speaking at a meeting of the civil rights organisation Justice in London on Monday evening, Thomas said: "Our system of justice does need reshaping to deal with the fundamental change that is occurring in the role of the state. It is retrenching. The budget for justice is being reduced substantially."
While other areas of public spending had been saved from deep cuts, the justice system has been left "unprotected from that retrenchment", he said, adding: "It has undergone cuts before but this it is very, very different. The magnitude of the cuts will … be something in the order of at least a third in real terms of the 2010 expenditure. Moreover, the anticipation is that the cuts will be permanent and not merely whilst times of austerity are with us."
Reductions in legal aid have already resulted in a "significant increase" in the number of unrepresented litigants in person in family and civil cases. Thomas said: "Traditional procedures are not best suited to a dispute between a father and mother over a child when inevitably matters that have caused emotional stress are raised by them in court as adversaries in person rather than being raised by lawyers acting for them."
An inquisitorial system might be an improvement for litigants in person and "secure a fair trial for all whilst doing so within limited and reducing resources," he said. "The essence of the change would be a much greater degree of inquiry by the judge into the evidence being brought forward."
Some lawyers, he admitted, would see it as a "process alien to our adversarial tradition". Research would have to consider whether an inquisitorial procedure would require more judges or a "new cadre of junior judges".
On crown courts and jury trial, Thomas said: "At the moment the crown courts deals with a wide range of offences from the most serious to what can be described as the much less serious – fights where injuries are not overly severe and dishonesty where the monetary value is small."
Past proposals for an intermediate court between magistrates and crown court, in which the bench consists of a district judge sitting with two magistrates, had been rejected as too radical.
The lord chief justice acknowledged that the "altering of the boundaries of cases where trial by jury is available is an issue on which … there are very strongly held views".
But, he added: "Circumstances have changed: there is far less work for magistrates to do and the crown court is heavily overburdened by a significant proportion of its work relating to serious sexual offences. Surely it is time again t consider this issue again given the financial circumstances in which we are now placed."
